Introduction
Angkor, a complex of magnificent temples of the historical Khmer kingdom, was built
over a period of 300 years, from the end of the ninth to the end of the twelfth century.
This became possible due to a remarkable irrigation system and an extremely favourable
geographical location. A tourist industry is currently developing around Angkor and the
nearby town of Siem Reap.
|
|
|
  © CNES 1996 |
Click to View :   
(i)Enlarged Image;    
(ii)The Angkor Wat;    
(iii)The Barays;    
(iv)The Forest
|
Physical geography
Angkor was built on the alluvial plain next to the large lake of Tonlé
Sap, the edge of which is seen towards the south of the image. A range of hills
occur towards the northeast and scattered low hills rise from the plain leading
down to the lake. The sandstone and laterite of these hills were used for constructing
the temples of Angkor. Tonlé Sap extends its normal area of about 3000
km2 by another 150 percent during the wet monsoon of May-October. This
primarily happens by the upstream passage of water along the Tonlé Sap River
from the flooded Mekong reaching the lake. During the dry season, the downstream
flow of the Tonlé Sap River is resumed and the lake level drops by 10-12 m.
Tonlé Sap therefore is a rich source of freshwater fish which along with
technologically enhanced rice yield made the Khmer kingdom prosperous enough to
build the Angkor complex.
Irrigation
During the days of the Khmer kingdom, about 1000 km2 of land was served
by the irrigation system based on artificial reservoirs called
barays. The most
striking of these was the Western Baray built around 1050 AD, the largest dark shaded
rectangle near the centre of the image. This 8 km X 2.2 km reservoir had a full
storage capacity of about 40 million m3 of water. The reservoirs were
not dug into the ground but surrounded by embankments. As the level of the stored
water rose above ground level, water could be sent to the paddy fields by gravity
feed. Such an irrigation practice started towards the end of the ninth century,
and as a result, multiple crops of rice could be grown each year even through the
dry season. The other large reservoir seen in the image is the Eastern Baray in
the centre (Fig. 1), which is now dry but its raised embankments are clearly visible.
Water for irrigation today is stored in numerous small tanks seen towards the northeast,
which utilise the local relief features.
The temple complex of Angkor
The word Angkor is derived from the Sanskrit word for a city. Angkor not only was
a complex of temples but also of urban settlements. During the Khmer civilisation,
only the temples were built in stone and bricks, all other houses were in wood or
earth. Only the temples therefore have survived as archaeological evidences of once
prosperous and civilised cities.
The Indian contribution to religion, language, art, city planning and irrigated rice
farming in historical Cambodia is extremely important. All this is reflected at Angkor.
Many of the temples are funerary temples built to commemorate individual kings, but the
temples were also at the same time divine structures as Hindu Gods and Bodhisattavas
were worshipped there. The kings were perceived as god-kings ruled by divine prerogatives
who could communicate directly with the gods, and their deaths transformed the kings
into gods. This explains why so many temples were built by the Khmer kings. The
architecture of the temples was based on symbolism of the universe from the Hindu
mythology. Apart from the temple of Bayon, majority of the temples are Hindu.
Bayon is a Buddhist structure where the faces of Bodhisattavas on its many towers
resemble the then great Khmer king, Jayavarman VII.
The first group of temples were built near Roulos towards the southeastern corner
of the image. Later, the Khmer kings moved their capital to Angkor where the Khmer
art and architecture flourished to give rise to the temple complex of Angkor. Figure 1
which is a plan of the temple complex helps to identify the temples and reservoirs on
the image. The major temples and some background information are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Major structures at and near Angkor
|
Temple |
Built or Started by |
Date |
Remarks |
|
Roluos Group
Prah Ko |
Indravarman I |
879 |
Funerary temple of Jayavarman II |
|
Bakong |
Indravarman I |
881 |
|
|
Lolei |
Yasovarman I |
893 |
|
|
Phnom Bakheng |
Yasovarman I |
~900 |
|
|
Koh Ker Group |
Jayavarman IV |
post 921 |
|
|
Eastern Mébon |
Rajendravarman II |
952 |
temple inside the Eastern Baray |
|
Bantéay Srei |
Jayavarman V |
967 |
Small beautiful temple dedicated to Shiva |
|
Phimeanakas |
Rajendravarman II |
post 978 |
|
|
Ta Kéo |
Jayavarman V |
~1000 |
|
|
Baphuon |
Udayadityavarman II |
~1060 |
|
|
Western Baray |
Udayadityavarman II |
|
|
|
Western Mébon |
|
late 11th C. |
Vishnu temple inside the baray |
|
Angkor Wat |
Suryavarman II |
early 12th C. |
the best known temple of Angkor, originally dedicated to Vishnu, later Buddhist additions |
|
Ta Prohm |
Jayavarman VII |
1186 |
|
|
Prah Khan |
Jayavarman VII |
1191 |
|
|
Bayon |
Jayavarman VII |
end, 12th C. |
the most important temple in Angkor Thom, Buddhist. |
|
Reconstruction of Angkor Thom |
Jayavarman VII |
end, 12th C |
the royal city |
It is believed that the intensive building phase towards the end of
the rule of the powerful Khmer king Jayavarman VII exhausted the kingdom; and although
the Khmer kings ruled at Angkor for another century and half, it was not with the old
glory. Finally, invaders from Siam attacked and sacked Angkor three times, in 1353,
1393, and 1431. The irrigation system began to fail due to the shortage of labour and
maintenance, and the Khmer capital was shifted to Phnom Penh, the site of the present
capital of Cambodia, leaving Angkor to be swallowed by the forest. A large part of the
temple complex is still covered by dense vegetation. A number of the structures are in
ruin, and are both destroyed and held up by huge trees and creepers. The forgotten Angkor
became known again from the accounts of the French travellers in the second half of the
19th century. The effort of the archaeologists at restoration, particularly since the
1920s, have succeeded to some extent. Our knowledge of Angkor is derived from such work
and the past accounts of travellers such as Chou Ta Kuen who came to Angkor in the
late 13th century and wrote an account of the glory of the Khmer kingdom.
Angkor currently is a tourist destination, although tourism is
restricted due to the ravages of the Khmer Rouge times and the continuing danger
of armed men and unexploded mines in the less trodden parts of the complex. The
town of Siem Reap, south of Angkor Wat is growing as tourism develops. The airstrip
for Angkor is clearly visible south of the Western Baray. Whether enhanced tourism
of the future will affect the serenity and tranquillity of Angkor and the survival
of its structures remains to be seen.
|
|